Which dropped him to his knees, but the lights stayed on. So Reacher swung again, this time properly right-handed, probably good enough for nothing more than a fly ball at a July Fourth picnic, but more than adequate against human biology. The guy rocked sideways and then flopped forward on his face. His code is chivalric, in the sense that he fights on behalf of the good; sometimes this means the weak and the wronged, sometimes this means the U. His actions, though, are as unchivalric as they come.
If he gets a chance to shoot someone in the back rather than the front, he takes it. There are recurring tropes and themes. The novels roam across America, with a notable affection for places in the middle, for big, blank landscapes, for small towns where no one apart from Reacher ever wants to stop. He visits rural Nebraska, rural South Dakota in winter, back-country Texas in summer. He likes communities that, to outsiders, seem nowhere in particular. He dramatizes the lives you glimpse through a bus window, the glance into warm buildings from the cold outdoors.
The writer whom Child most recalls, in this respect, is Georges Simenon, whose Maigret novels are the work of a man who travelled around France observing strangers and their mysterious routines. Simenon spent a lot of time in the kinds of places where travellers spend time. Readers find it easy to identify with this perspective: we ourselves are outsiders peeking into another world, like Reacher or Maigret. He is a permanent wanderer, hopping from town to town with no aim in mind, and the novels are the story of the trouble he finds.
Not only does he own nothing; he carries nothing. He buys a new set every few days. A survey by Clorox found that one in eight American men fails to change his underpants daily. He is an existential hero, the apotheosis of the lone stranger, travelling the Lower Forty-eight with nothing but his folding toothbrush and his code.
Here again is the shift from implausibility to something that feels real. The alienated, possessionless freedom of Reacher has a core of emotional truth. His version of freedom challenges the Superman test, but the yearning it expresses feels real. In the course of those twenty-one years, the Midlander Jim Grant has become the U.
Shocked at the accused's request, Reacher sets out to confirm for himself the absolute certainty of the man's guilt, but comes up with more than he bargained for. The law has limits. He does not. Rated PG for violence, language and some drug material.
Did you know Edit. Trivia When Jack Reacher's car crashes into some barrels, the car accidentally stalled upon the impact, but Tom Cruise was luckily able to restart the car before driving off again. Rather than do a retake, Christopher McQuarrie decided to leave it in the film, as he felt it added to the suspense of the scene.
Quotes Jack Reacher : You think I'm a hero? Paramount, desiring the '12A' rating, asked them to reconsider the decision. In order for the film to be given a '12A' rating the BBFC requested 2s of cuts, which Paramount subsequently accepted, to two scenes; One cut takes place where Sandy is suffocated near to her apartment and the other when a henchman is hit over the head with a rock in the quarry. The DVD and Blu-ray versions are uncut and rated '15'.
User reviews Review. Top review. Limited Greatness. For those who've read it, you already know Tom Cruise isn't right for the role. One would wish they could've gotten a bigger and taller actor to play the role like Hugh Jackman, or Chris Evans, or someone else. It could have been a new iconic appearance for a hero. The real problem is it seems Tom Cruise is just redoing his generic action hero performance.
As much as he refuses to call himself a hero, he still looks like one but in a much glossier way. In spite of that, the film itself is a snazzy piece of entertainment that is rare in cinema these days. A neo-noir styled action blockbuster that will grip you by its storytelling and its action scenes. There's a chance that could have made this a much better film but put aside those complains, it's still pretty awesome.
The film begins with a man shooting five random innocent people. It effectively builds tension by being silent. The rest of the movie is as slick as the opening and it serves a great entertainment.
The only disappointment is Tom Cruise. He may not have the appearance of the character but he could have done a lot more than just doing his typical action hero swagger.
He sure has charisma but that's all. His fans might still think he's pretty cool for it. I'm not a fan of comparing a book to its film adaptation. I never cared if a single plot point or character was changed, but the Jack Reacher character is the real deal here. It seems this film is only made for Cruise to get him back in action. Well this character is not for him. The film is still solidly made. At least it doesn't go to the modern generic action movie direction that is relentlessly loud but sticks to the neo-noir storytelling.
The best parts is when it spends time in scrutinizing the case in silence. A sequel, Jack Reacher: Never Go Back , was produced with a different director, but after that was released and Cruise got busy with Mission: Impossible , the producers decided it was time to reboot the franchise all over again — this time on the small screen. But Ritchson got a second shot when there was a behind-the-scenes change-up on the Jack Reacher TV series:.
The closer I got to that, the more familiar I became with the Reacher stuff. The way that he goes down the checklist and picks apart these cases, you need time. I think spending a season on each book is gonna be really enjoyable for audiences.
0コメント